Arizona Car Accident Insurance Law: Understanding First & Third Party Claims
UPDATED: February 20, 2020
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident law decisions. Finding trusted and reliable legal advice should be easy. This doesn't influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Insurance companies have different relationships with those who are involved in car accidents ï¿½ and those relationships often dictate how, and how fast, they handle claims. Here's a quick overview of the differences between first and third party claims from our legal expert on Arizona car accidents.
First party vs. third party claims
We asked Dave Wattel, an Arizona attorney who has been handling plaintiffs' cases exclusively for over 20 years, to explain the difference between first and third party claims and how insurance companies adjust claims according to those relationships. Here's what he told us:
If itï¿½s a first-party claim, that is youï¿½re dealing with your own carrier, they have to adjust [claims] within a reasonable period of time ï¿½ the definition of which is always open for discussion. With a third-party carrier or third-party claim, you've got to understand that that carrier owes nothing to the claimant. The defendant that causes the accident, allegedly, is not responsible for paying the claimant or the victim anything until a judge and jury renders a decision and a judgment has been obtained.
Obligations to pay & defend
The insurance company that insures the defendant has two obligations and two obligations only, according to Wattel, ï¿½One, its obligation to pay. Two, its obligation to defend. However, both of those are the insurance companyï¿½s choice. So when they make a low ball offer, or no offer, to a victim or claimant, theyï¿½re essentially saying, 'We donï¿½t think much of your claim and weï¿½re confident that weï¿½re willing to elect our duty to defend obligation under the terms of the policy.'
ï¿½Or they may just say, 'Hey listen. Weï¿½re choosing to defend this claim along with other claims because thatï¿½s our business model at present and we think that it will save us money in the long run.' They think that if they get tough and force the plaintiffï¿½s bar to litigate that some plaintiffï¿½s lawyers might not take those cases and may settle them short of full value.ï¿½
Wattel says that you've got to understand that in a third-party setting, even though the person stopped at a red light and got slammed from behind, the insurance company that insures the defendant who causes the accident has no obligation to offer anything because the obligation is to the insured, not to the victim of the accident.
If you've been injured in an auto accident or want to know more about what obligations your insurance company owes you, contact an experienced auto accident attorney for a free consultation.