Who Is at Fault for an Accident in a Parking Lot?

UPDATED: Jul 20, 2023Fact Checked

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Jeffrey Johnson

Insurance Lawyer

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Insurance Lawyer

UPDATED: Jul 20, 2023

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

UPDATED: Jul 20, 2023Fact Checked

The consequences of hitting a car in a parking lot or on some other private property are the same as for doing so on a public street: if you were at fault, you are liable for the damages caused. The legal rules of negligence apply in the same way for car accidents occurring on private property as they do for public streets.

Negligence is one of the most important concepts in the law. It is the grounds for almost all personal injury lawsuits, from auto accidents to medical malpractice. A failure to use due care which in turn causes injury to someone else gives the injured person a right to collect damages for their injury in a lawsuit.

The classic way to explain negligence is based on a “reasonable person” who always exercises care. The reasonable person always looks where he or she is going, never crosses the street without looking both ways, and so on. So, if you’re doing things in a way that this reasonable person would not, that’s negligence! It’s a concept that is centuries old, but which has continued its fundamental role in our system.

It can sometimes be harder to prove fault in a parking lot accident, especially if traffic lanes are not well marked or are poorly designed so that, for example, it isn’t clear what lane you should have been driving in. On the other hand, if the accident happened because you were texting while you were driving, and you either admit that or a witness saw you doing it, you’re going to be held at fault for the damages.

Perhaps the biggest difference between an accident on a street and one on private property is that, in some jurisdictions, the police will not write tickets for parking lot accidents. In traffic accidents, when the at-fault driver gets a ticket for something like careless driving, and is found guilty of the careless driving, that traffic ticket verdict can sometimes be used to help prove negligence.

Regardless of where the accident occurred, however, the law in your state or locality will likely require you to make a written report to the police if the accident caused more than a minimum amount of damage. If you have been in a car accident and are afraid you might be at fault, you may wish to consult an experienced car accident attorney in your state to discuss your options.

Case Studies: Determining Fault in Parking Lot Accidents

Case Study 1: Unclear Lane Design

In a crowded shopping mall parking lot, two drivers, John and Lisa, collided while trying to enter a store’s parking lane simultaneously. The parking lanes were poorly marked, leading to confusion about the right-of-way. John claims he was following the flow of traffic, while Lisa argues that she had the right-of-way based on her position. The lack of clear lane design complicates the determination of fault in this case, as both parties present conflicting accounts of the accident.

Case Study 2: Distracted Driving

At a grocery store parking lot, Sarah was texting on her phone while backing out of a parking space. Unaware of her surroundings, she collided with another vehicle parked behind her. A witness observed Sarah using her phone at the time of the accident. The distraction caused by texting while driving clearly establishes Sarah’s fault in the collision.

Case Study 3: Minimal Damage Incident

In a small parking lot, Mark accidentally scratched the side of another car while attempting to park his vehicle. The damage was minimal, and there were no witnesses to the incident. Mark and the other car’s owner, Emily, both agree to handle the matter privately without involving insurance companies. The absence of substantial damage and witnesses makes it challenging to prove fault in this case, as there is no clear evidence to support either party’s claim.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Jeffrey Johnson

Insurance Lawyer

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Insurance Lawyer

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption